To Test or not to Test
To Test or Not to Test
Every year the schools prepare student to take their statewide test. The adoption of a test-driven educational system creates unhealthy competition between schools. This
competition has led to inappropriate preparation strategies such as spending excessive amounts of time on tested
content to the exclusion of mandated curricula. Some teachers also teach to the test, that is, they train students by
using actual or look-alike items from previous assessments (Popham, 2001). Our district has spent a ridiculous amount of money on programs and training on how to be a better test taker. Each year we would stop teaching our regular curriculum and do test prep. We had books and workbooks for each of the students. The test is supoosed to help the teacher and the school with finding out where the studetn is struggling in abd find a way to help the studetn suceed in that area next year. The problem is with teachers getting new curriculum or being moved to another grade level it is hard for teachers to know exactly what didn't go well. That's what classroom tests do. It gives the teacher a better understanding of where the student didn't understand something and if the teacher needs to reteach the concept differently.
As a special education teacher, I adapt and modify my students' tests to check for their understanding of the concept that was taught. The student can give me the answers in various ways. They can give the answer to me on the computer, verbally, or on paper. But when it comes to the state test the only way to give the answer is on the computer. The students who can't recognize letters or numbers struggle with finding how to answer the question. The students who cannot spell end up getting a lower score even though it is the correct answer but just spelled incorrectly. While others stress to make sure they get to the top of the percentile for their grade level. Classifying a student based on his or her performance at one point is analogous to a doctor
diagnosing a patient with high blood pressure based on one reading. Just as a patient’s blood pressure will fluctuate
over time, so too will a student’s performance. Factors such as test anxiety adversely affect student performance
(Hardy, 2003,). The scores should be based on the classroom performance test as well on the state test to determine what percentile the student belongs to. However, critics argue that it places too much emphasis on test scores and does not accurately reflect student learning. (Wright, 2023). Besides, the only ones who truly care about the statewide scores are the school, the district, and the state. The majority of students and parents don't. The test score for the state is not even taken into consideration when applying for college.
Do you think statewide tests are just competition for the states?
What do you think about giving students the statewide test?
What about our special education students? Is it fair to give them a "grade-level" state test?
https://sites.google.com/eagles.cui.edu/marilyngubac/blogs
References
Hardy, L. (2003). Overburdened, overwhelmed. American School Board Journal, 190(4), 18-23.
Popham, W. J. (2001). Teaching to the test. Educational Leadership, 58(6), 16-20.
Wright, S. (2023). The effects of standardized testing on student learning and teacher instruction. In Research & Reviews: Research Journal of Educational Studies, Research & Reviews: Research Journal of Educational Studies (Vol. 9, Issue 1) [Journal-article]. https://doi.org/10.4172/JES.9.1.005

Comments
Post a Comment